Summary Differences: Vought F8U/F-8 Crusader

You can't tell the players without a scorecard:


Comments

  1. rimerresun.pubs@gmail.comNovember 27, 2020 at 9:46 AM

    Had the privilege of flight training with one of the “Blues” who was later killed preparing for an air show. We were in T-28’s, and our instructor, who had flown F-8’s, was determined we should shoot down the same pipeline. I was having difficulty clearing my ears after flights ending with “jet penetration” maneuver. The T-28 was unpressurized, while the F-8 was pressurized. Hadn’t done my homework, as that might have made a difference in my decision to go “low and slow.” Hence, a career in rotary wing I thoroughly enjoyed, but admittedly, often wonder where the venerable F-8 would have taken me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. makrzeSeptember 22, 2021 at 12:43 PM

    Hi Taildspin. I'm paper scale modeler. Just found your blog and all infos about F-8. I'm fascinated with this aircraft and I'm going to draw my own paper project of F-8. Could you give me a hint where to search for a detailed drawings/plans?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TailspinSeptember 22, 2021 at 1:49 PM

      email me: tommythomason sbcglobal net (put @ and . in place of spaces)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RF-8 Conversions

Image
 From Tom's post on Hyperscale: There have been several RF-8 conversions over the years, none particularly good. The first was the War Eagle vac for the ESCI kit. The conversion was in some respects better than the base kit, but not worth messing with, because the ESCI kit is really awful. Two resin conversions were done for the Monogram kit, the one by Maintrack and one by C and H. Of the two, the Maintrack is the more accurate in that it made a real stab at the smaller nose. It is a one piece forward fuselage conversion, but does have a cockpit molded in. C and H just put a Cobra nose cone on a Monogram fuselage which stands out like a sore thumb. Plus, it is also a one piece forward fuselage conversion, but their is one no cockpit! Try doing the intake and cockpit on that! It even buffaloed Phil Brandt. I always hoped Bill Koster would do one, but he didn't. So far there have also been two for the Hasegawa kit: RVHP and, again, C and H. RVHP gives you the who
Read more

1/72nd F-8 Kit Review

1. Academy F-8E, F-8E(FN), F-8J. The three listed types have been released, and this is definitely the best 1/72nd F-8, but it is far from perfect, having a lot of warts, most of which it inherited from its illegitimate parent, the Hasegawa 1/48th kit, but some are all its own. Some “genetic” errors include the bogus angled radar screen in the cockpit, the bogus bumps on the upper wing at the wing fold, the flat plank representation of the ACM exhaust fairing on the right fuselage, and the rudder which is not right at the lower forward edge, there should be more of a cut out for the rudder post. A couple errors that are pure Academy are the front windscreen, which has a center section that is about twice as wide as it should be, and the radome cross section, which is egg-shaped , little end up, where it should be an ellipse, long dimension up (It, like all other E kits, is also wrong in profile, being symmetrical when it shouldn‘t be). The latter is not all that no
Read more

F-8 Radome Comparisons

Image
The F-8A through F-8D had a narrow radome (strictly speaking, the A's nose was only a radome at the very tip for a range-finder radar); the F-8E had a wider, round radome. The A/D radome cross-section is on the left; the E's is on the right:  The upper set of pictures is the early radome, the lower is the later one. The F-8A also had a small window on the left side of the nose for a gun camera. The round (wider) radome required a different interface with the forward fuselage (note that the pitot of the E radome has moved from the side of the fuselage as shown above and on the left below to the tip of the radome and the vents aft of the radome are different in number and location): The later round radome was also not symmetrical from top to bottom when viewed from the side:
Read more