Summary Differences: Vought F8U/F-8 Crusader

You can't tell the players without a scorecard:


Comments

  1. rimerresun.pubs@gmail.comNovember 27, 2020 at 9:46 AM

    Had the privilege of flight training with one of the “Blues” who was later killed preparing for an air show. We were in T-28’s, and our instructor, who had flown F-8’s, was determined we should shoot down the same pipeline. I was having difficulty clearing my ears after flights ending with “jet penetration” maneuver. The T-28 was unpressurized, while the F-8 was pressurized. Hadn’t done my homework, as that might have made a difference in my decision to go “low and slow.” Hence, a career in rotary wing I thoroughly enjoyed, but admittedly, often wonder where the venerable F-8 would have taken me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. makrzeSeptember 22, 2021 at 12:43 PM

    Hi Taildspin. I'm paper scale modeler. Just found your blog and all infos about F-8. I'm fascinated with this aircraft and I'm going to draw my own paper project of F-8. Could you give me a hint where to search for a detailed drawings/plans?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TailspinSeptember 22, 2021 at 1:49 PM

      email me: tommythomason sbcglobal net (put @ and . in place of spaces)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

F8U (F-8) Wing

Image
9 August 2022: Added information about the color of the underside of the wing that was above the fuselage The F8U had two different wings: Original and BLC (Boundary Layer Control). The BLC wing was developed for the French Navy Crusader E(FN) to provide a lower landing speed. It was incorporated in the remanufacture of U.S. Navy F-8Es that were designated F-8J for the same reason but not retrofitted to any earlier F-8s, including rebuilds. When the original wing was raised (to 7° incidence), the leading and trailing edge flaps and ailerons automatically drooped from the cruise neutral position, i.e. leading-edge flaps up. Most of the trailing edge control surfaces were ailerons. A small inboard section next to the fuselage was an actual flap, in that it was either up or down. The trailing edge surfaces drooped 20°. The outboard leading edge flaps drooped 27°; the inboard (center section), 25°. The Unit Horizontal Tail (aka stabilator) moved 5° leading edge up for nose-down pitch...
Read more

1/72nd F-8 Kit Review

1. Academy F-8E, F-8E(FN), F-8J. The three listed types have been released, and this is definitely the best 1/72nd F-8, but it is far from perfect, having a lot of warts, most of which it inherited from its illegitimate parent, the Hasegawa 1/48th kit, but some are all its own. Some “genetic” errors include the bogus angled radar screen in the cockpit, the bogus bumps on the upper wing at the wing fold, the flat plank representation of the ACM exhaust fairing on the right fuselage, and the rudder which is not right at the lower forward edge, there should be more of a cut out for the rudder post. A couple errors that are pure Academy are the front windscreen, which has a center section that is about twice as wide as it should be, and the radome cross section, which is egg-shaped , little end up, where it should be an ellipse, long dimension up (It, like all other E kits, is also wrong in profile, being symmetrical when it shouldn‘t be). The latter is not all that no...
Read more