F-8 Landing Gear

There were changes over time to the landing gear, in part due to the increased gross weight, including the wheel hubs.

The original nose landing gear (here, from an E):

All rebuild F-8s (F-8H/J/K/L and RF-8G) got new nose gear struts that were about two inches longer than the original and incorporated the cable deflector horns on the wheel forks that had made their first appearance on the A-7 nose strut.

 Main Landing Gear:


 The A-7 design was based (loosely) on the F-8 so there are certain similarities and a definite family resemblance, but there is little commonality between the two, though the main gear is one commonality, at least in part, and in the reverse direction: from A-7 to F-8. In the rebuild program of the late 60's, the H (ex D) and J (ex E) got A-7 main struts. In spite of what is stated in more than a couple sources, no other version got them at that time, though the RF-8G did get them in the late 70's from the retired H and J aircraft (along with their P420 engines). Only these three models, no others, ever got the A-7 type main struts. The A-7 and F-8 share the same main gear geometry but they differ in details. Look at the main strut (the lower section) on the two types: on the F-8 gear there is a flange at the mid section, which is missing on the A-7 gear.



The A-7 main strut (the lower strut, the upper one is the shock strut, the rear one is the retraction strut) is actually a slightly smaller diameter than the F-8 item, but you can turn the Hasegawa or Academy E gear to a convincing H/J gear by simply removing the flange.

To sum up on F-8 gear: all F-8 models were originally built with the standard F-8 type main gear. The H and J got A-7 style mains in the rebuild program, and the RF-8G was equipped with those struts in the late 70's taken from the now retired H and J fighters. The K (ex C) and L (ex B) main gear were replaced in the rebuild, but with low-cycle (landings, basically) gear taken from D and E models.


Did the F-8H and J receive only the center, main strut of the A-7, or the entire main gear assembly (main, shock, and retraction struts)? Interesting question and I don't know the answer. I never really thought about it and assumed everything was replaced. I know that the main struts were changed and technically it is just the lower forward part that is the main strut, so perhaps that is all that was changed, but I would be inclined to think that the shock strut, at least, was also changed. If you compare them, F-8 to A-7, they are pretty much indistinguishable, so from a modeling standpoint it would be moot, and from a cost standpoint it would be a negligible savings not to replace everything. To sum up, back to the beginning: I don't know. Sorry I can't be more definitive.

Main Landing Wheel Well Details:

 

Where did the accumulator go? Into the speed-brake well.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RF-8 Conversions

Image
 From Tom's post on Hyperscale: There have been several RF-8 conversions over the years, none particularly good. The first was the War Eagle vac for the ESCI kit. The conversion was in some respects better than the base kit, but not worth messing with, because the ESCI kit is really awful. Two resin conversions were done for the Monogram kit, the one by Maintrack and one by C and H. Of the two, the Maintrack is the more accurate in that it made a real stab at the smaller nose. It is a one piece forward fuselage conversion, but does have a cockpit molded in. C and H just put a Cobra nose cone on a Monogram fuselage which stands out like a sore thumb. Plus, it is also a one piece forward fuselage conversion, but their is one no cockpit! Try doing the intake and cockpit on that! It even buffaloed Phil Brandt. I always hoped Bill Koster would do one, but he didn't. So far there have also been two for the Hasegawa kit: RVHP and, again, C and H. RVHP gives you the who
Read more

1/72nd F-8 Kit Review

1. Academy F-8E, F-8E(FN), F-8J. The three listed types have been released, and this is definitely the best 1/72nd F-8, but it is far from perfect, having a lot of warts, most of which it inherited from its illegitimate parent, the Hasegawa 1/48th kit, but some are all its own. Some “genetic” errors include the bogus angled radar screen in the cockpit, the bogus bumps on the upper wing at the wing fold, the flat plank representation of the ACM exhaust fairing on the right fuselage, and the rudder which is not right at the lower forward edge, there should be more of a cut out for the rudder post. A couple errors that are pure Academy are the front windscreen, which has a center section that is about twice as wide as it should be, and the radome cross section, which is egg-shaped , little end up, where it should be an ellipse, long dimension up (It, like all other E kits, is also wrong in profile, being symmetrical when it shouldn‘t be). The latter is not all that no
Read more

F-8 Radome Comparisons

Image
The F-8A through F-8D had a narrow radome (strictly speaking, the A's nose was only a radome at the very tip for a range-finder radar); the F-8E had a wider, round radome. The A/D radome cross-section is on the left; the E's is on the right:  The upper set of pictures is the early radome, the lower is the later one. The F-8A also had a small window on the left side of the nose for a gun camera. The round (wider) radome required a different interface with the forward fuselage (note that the pitot of the E radome has moved from the side of the fuselage as shown above and on the left below to the tip of the radome and the vents aft of the radome are different in number and location): The later round radome was also not symmetrical from top to bottom when viewed from the side:
Read more